Il Sole 24 ore
The severance pay of the companies used for current expenditure
Roberto Round
ROME
Short circuit
01 Until 31 December 2006, severance pay not for supplementary pensions remained in business until the termination of employment (except for any advances requested by the employee). With effect from 1 January 2007 have changed the rules for the transfer of TFR to complementary pension schemes. From that date, each employee had to decide whether to allocate the severance pay to complementary pension schemes maturing or maintained by the employer
02 the private sector of severance, "the so-called" Treasury Fund ". It is a state fund managed by INPS created for reasons of public finance 03
X-NONE
More than a rap the Government, is a full-scale alert. From 2007 to 2010 the state has collected 15.86 billion of severance pay to workers who lose not for security Further, without "any mechanism for reintegration 'severance pay fund managed by INPS. More: Nor has always intended the funds to the objectives set by law, and often used them for current spending. How not to be. And the Court of Auditors shall confirm: it is "an expropriation without compensation of nature or otherwise of indirect taxation in respect of payments to stakeholders aimed at very different purposes from support to public finance."
The judiciary had already criticized the amount of severance pay if chosen by workers and companies (with resolution 2/2010/G), but now, with a specific report to both Houses, he returned to the attack. With more data and a made of tough comments. Even if you removed the 'disease' at the time objected to the Ministry of the Interior from 2010 that has no more spending for the current share of the severance pay received (see "Il Sole 24 Ore, 19 February 2010), for example pay for clerical workers socially useful by the municipalities of Naples and Palermo to subsidize the purchase of textbooks for students in need.
Pa for the rest of the universe is dark, almost. It has not been set in motion is no mechanism for reimbursement of the INPS fund from which sums have been taken for the 2007-2009 and 2010. "In fact, the dispute mechanism is confirmed at least until the end of the decade since its introduction ' when, compared to 15.86 billion collected so far, are expected to expire 30 billion in withdrawals.
Surveys in Economics in its investigation, said in a soothing: there will be "no harm to stakeholders to payments and withdrawals," will indeed improved the balance of state budget for a long period of years in just a predictable period of "difficulties of public finance." Replica
but "the Court of Auditors considers that it can not share," the report says, because "such a withdrawal, without the related requirement of full recovery," becomes in fact a "confiscatory nature of operation or indirect taxation 'which also has nothing to do with the support of public accounts.
More: accounting judges (speakers and Fabio Carosi Aldo Viola section of the performance audit of government departments) challenge the thesis of the 'alleged pattern of active pension management concerned' and that 'it can grant funding not only the investments' current expenditures but also thanks to "a trend in favor of at least ten years."
The financial data provided to the Court are in fact considered at least partial, incomplete and based on "elementary statistics" that do not allow such optimistic visions. Indeed. Also because "under terms of the budget balances the lack of data inquiry and the underestimation of important critical factors "will create" imbalances "of which" could make the costs future taxpayers and recipients of benefits' retirement.
heavy words. With the final underscore a potential "danger": use the severance pay fund "for purely financial purposes of funding could affect future budget balances." It threatens to "create problems of intergenerational equity at the expense of future taxpayers and recipients of services. ©
RESERVED REPRODUCTION Short circuit
01 Until 31 December 2006, severance pay not for supplementary pensions remained in business until the termination of employment (except for any advances requested by the employee). With effect from 1 January 2007 have changed the rules for the transfer of TFR to complementary pension schemes. From that date, each employee had to decide whether to allocate the severance pay to complementary pension schemes maturing or maintained by the employer
02 the private sector of severance, "the so-called" Treasury Fund ". It is a state fund managed by INPS created for reasons of public finance 03
X-NONE
For this reason, the CGIL partecipainsieme to all those who share the need and rationale for such a mobilization that is primarily cultural and consciences, perallargare weight, the role and influence of the subjects of rappresentanzasociale, sign in understood as participation in a democracy, strong It's much more aware. The event of 12 March is also important for this unmomento.
0 comments:
Post a Comment